Welcome to Clintons for McCain!
Friday, October 13th, 2006
Do You Really Know Barack Obama?
Is This Your Kind of Change?
READ MY LIPSTICK... NOBAMA!
Click on Shirt to Order
Here's change WE can believe in!
That glass ceiling with 18 million cracks in it? Shattered!
While Nancy Pelosi was spending millions of our dollars to pimp out her private jet, Alaska Governor Sarah Palin was selling the one from the prior corrupt administration on e-bay, and cutting her own pay! While Obama throws his best VP candidate -- the one who got 18 million votes -- under the bus, John McCain welcomes a new conductor aboard the straight talk express. While Joe Biden relies on the old playbook of negativity, John McCain looks to the future of America. That future is, Country First, Country over Party, optimism and hell no BHO!Clintons4McCain is pleased and thrilled with McCain's choice, a choice for change -- finally-- WE can believe in! Palin is Nobama all the way, doesn't back down, she is in it to WIN it and to serve the common good, never "falls in line" and we welcome her to the fray!
We are Volunteers -- Join Us Now!
Welcome to the official website of the Clintons for McCain movement, AKA Clintons4McCain. Working to empower voters nationwide, this maverick group vows to bring you the REAL Barack Hussein Obama, and focus on current affairs ignored by the main stream media. We welcome article contributions and suggestions, and of course volunteer help! Please JOIN US.Although we do not take financial donations, you can help keep America from becoming an Obama-nation. You can participate in our forum, stay informed or volunteer to help at your local level. We also encourage you to keep democracy alive by making your voice heard...we encourage you to vote and to go out and recruit other voters in your area. It's time to show that you are an American patriot who believes as we do in, Country over Party. And, as our founding philosophy states, we are NObama!
Our subscribers are Hillary Clinton supporters, Democrats, Independents and moderate republicans, but anyone who agrees with NObama - under any circumstances is welcome here. Join us now and help us divert the possibility of an inexperienced, unvetted candidate from entering our White House and instead elect an honorable, trustworthy and honest man -- Senator John McCain -- to our nation's highest office.
Who is Obama?
Looks Like VA is Getting a Bump for Obama
A Race To The White House
So, Obama Thinks He Has More Experience Than Palin?
You Decide
A Race for the White House Indeed!
To support Obama, Does One Need to Stretch the Truth?
Biden says it loud and clear!
Do You Know All of Obama's Friends?
Obama's brother found
Is "ashamed" to admit Barack's related, lives in squalor on $1 a month
Some of our members sarcastically remark, "We would be ashamed too, were Barack Hussien Obama our brother" after having read the story on Obama's half brother. You can >click< for the UK Telegraph report on this story; you'll be able to take a good look into how the 'other half' of Obama's family lives. Is the result of happenstance when one is anointed and the other is forgotten? Obama lives like a King and his brother lives on a dollar a month?
"No-one knows who I am," he told the magazine, before claiming: "I live here on less than a dollar a month." BHO can throw his friends, grandmother and minister under the bus so we shouldn't be surprised to see his brother living in poverty without even a nod from Obama.
Shall we run next? With a resume like his, our own administrator is more experienced.
And, while we respect those with an open mind regarding Obama, is he really the man you want to hand over the keys to our nuclear arsenals?
Infants Born Alive, Obama Allows to Die
Christians Burned Alive and Obama Still Tied to Odinga...Why Is Sean Hannity the Only Media Source Covering This One?
Blood Brothers or Cousins...?
Reviewing of Paula Abeles' "Obama and Odinga" by Marni Delaney
Rumors always abound, but this well documented [from highly credible news sources] article by Paula Abeles is a treasure of truth, and one that everybody should see. It addresses the startling danger to our national security that lies behind the poor judgment and questionable associations that plague Barack Obama wherever he goes.A brief synopsis follows. The full article with full documentation and pictures can be found at www.realdemocratsusa.org . It is WELL worth the read, and, more disturbingly still, raises the question as to why mainstream media has not been more forthcoming in their coverage despite articles previously published in the N.Y. Times, London Times and USA Today.
What does this mean to the American people and, indeed the world?
Senator Obama's actions, decried by both the U.S. State Department and the former Kenyan government, were in direct opposition to the efforts and interests of both the Kenyan Christian population and U.S. National Security.
We are Gunny Approved!
Clintons4McCain is honored and deeply proud to have the official stamp of approval of US Marine Gunnery Sergeant (Hon. Ret.) R. Lee Ermey best known as "The Gunny" in movies and television, including his most recent program, "Mail Call."
We know how exclusive his "Gunny Approved" website selections are, how difficult it is to qualify as "Gunny Approved" and are thrilled to be part of that group. We're the ONLY "Nobama" type site to earn a spot on the Gunny's roll call of "squared away" websites! With the Gunny's stamp of approval, all c4m volunteers can puff their chests out, hold their chins high and yell Ooooo-RAHH!
Semper Fi Gunny! We thank you and honor you and all service men and women for keeping the United States the Land of the Free and Home of the Brave, and for your service, sacrifice and dedication. Carry on, Marine!
Is Obama a Habitual Liar and a Flim-Flam man?
This is amusing to watch -- and Fox News is the only network to report on it -- Hussein's outright LIE that his uncle liberated Auschwitz. Keep your eye on Fox News and see what else they catch...
QUICK! Make a choice.
Do you really even need to think about it?
McCain's "forbidden" op-ed
c4m has obtained the opinion-editorial (op-ed) piece which Senator John McCain wrote and submitted to the New York Times last Friday July 18. This piece was "rejected" by the NYT although they gleefully published an op-ed by Barack Hussein Obama just a couple of days before. Their stated reasons for rejection was because McCain didn't include a "clear plan for achieving victory — with troops levels, timetables and measures for compelling the Iraqis to cooperate. And it would need to describe the senator's Afghanistan strategy, spelling out how it meshes with his Iraq plan."
McCain's campaign replied to this, McCain spokesman Tucker Bounds said, "John McCain believes that victory in Iraq must be based on conditions on the ground, not arbitrary timetables. Unlike Barack Obama, that position will not change based on politics or the demands of The New York Times."
So, the NYT is blatantly trying to squelch McCain's message, playing partisan politics, and clearly has no objectivity. It lost all credibility long ago, and clearly doesn't see any need to reclaim it. Here we'll publish Senator McCain's op-ed piece, in its entirety, below.
We are WINNING in Iraq.
Contributor: Senator John McCain
In January 2007, when General David Petraeus took command in Iraq, he called the situation “hard” but not “hopeless.” Today, 18 months later, violence has fallen by up to 80% to the lowest levels in four years, and Sunni and Shiite terrorists are reeling from a string of defeats. The situation now is full of hope, but considerable hard work remains to consolidate our fragile gains.
Now Senator Obama has been forced to acknowledge that “our troops have performed brilliantly in lowering the level of violence.” But he still denies that any political progress has resulted.
Perhaps he is unaware that the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad has recently certified that, as one news article put it, “Iraq has met all but three of 18 original benchmarks set by Congress last year to measure security, political and economic progress.” Even more heartening has been progress that’s not measured by the benchmarks. More than 90,000 Iraqis, many of them Sunnis who once fought against the government, have signed up as Sons of Iraq to fight against the terrorists. Nor do they measure Prime Minister Nouri al Maliki’s new-found willingness to crack down on Shiite extremists in Basra and Sadr City—actions that have done much to dispel suspicions of sectarianism.
The success of the surge has not changed Senator Obama’s determination to pull out all of our combat troops. All that has changed is his rationale. In a New York Times op-ed and a speech this week, he offered his “plan for Iraq” in advance of his first “fact finding” trip to that country in more than three years. It consisted of the same old proposal to pull all of our troops out within 16 months. In 2007 he wanted to withdraw because he thought the war was lost. If we had taken his advice, it would have been. Now he wants to withdraw because he thinks Iraqis no longer need our assistance.
To make this point, he mangles the evidence. He makes it sound as if Prime Minister Maliki has endorsed the Obama timetable, when all he has said is that he would like a plan for the eventual withdrawal of U.S. troops at some unspecified point in the future.
Senator Obama is also misleading on the Iraqi military's readiness. The Iraqi Army will be equipped and trained by the middle of next year, but this does not, as Senator Obama suggests, mean that they will then be ready to secure their country without a good deal of help. The Iraqi Air Force, for one, still lags behind, and no modern army can operate without air cover. The Iraqis are also still learning how to conduct planning, logistics, command and control, communications, and other complicated functions needed to support frontline troops.
No one favors a permanent U.S. presence, as Senator Obama charges. A partial withdrawal has already occurred with the departure of five “surge” brigades, and more withdrawals can take place as the security situation improves. As we draw down in Iraq, we can beef up our presence on other battlefields, such as Afghanistan, without fear of leaving a failed state behind. I have said that I expect to welcome home most of our troops from Iraq by the end of my first term in office, in 2013.
But I have also said that any draw-downs must be based on a realistic assessment of conditions on the ground, not on an artificial timetable crafted for domestic political reasons. This is the crux of my disagreement with Senator Obama.
Senator Obama has said that he would consult our commanders on the ground and Iraqi leaders, but he did no such thing before releasing his “plan for Iraq.” Perhaps that’s because he doesn’t want to hear what they have to say. During the course of eight visits to Iraq, I have heard many times from our troops what Major General Jeffrey Hammond, commander of coalition forces in Baghdad, recently said: that leaving based on a timetable would be “very dangerous.”
The danger is that extremists supported by Al Qaeda and Iran could stage a comeback, as they have in the past when we’ve had too few troops in Iraq. Senator Obama seems to have learned nothing from recent history. I find it ironic that he is emulating the worst mistake of the Bush administration by waving the “Mission Accomplished” banner prematurely.
I am also dismayed that he never talks about winning the war—only of ending it. But if we don’t win the war, our enemies will. A triumph for the terrorists would be a disaster for us. That is something I will not allow to happen as president. Instead I will continue implementing a proven counterinsurgency strategy not only in Iraq but also in Afghanistan with the goal of creating stable, secure, self-sustaining democratic allies.
With Friends Like These, Who Needs Al-Quada?
Is this the "change" you can vote for? Obama-Nation
Militant Michelle and Muslim Obama?
Sunday, July 20, 2008
Statement by the McCain Campaign
Contact: Press Office, 703-650-5550; www.JohnMcCain.com
Contact: Press Office, 703-650-5550; www.JohnMcCain.com
ARLINGTON, VA July 19 /Standard Newswire/ --
Today, McCain 2008 Senior Foreign Policy Advisor Randy Scheunemann issued the following statement:
"The difference between John McCain and Barack Obama is that Barack Obama advocates an unconditional withdrawal that ignores the facts on the ground and the advice of our top military commanders. John McCain believes withdrawal must be based on conditions on the ground. Prime Minister Maliki has repeatedly affirmed the same view, and did so again today. Timing is not as important as whether we leave with victory and honor, which is of no apparent concern to Barack Obama. The fundamental truth remains that Senator McCain was right about the surge and Senator Obama was wrong. We would not be in the position to discuss a responsible withdrawal today if Senator Obama's views had prevailed."
Despots and Tyrants Love Obama
Why VOTE for McCain?
Probably the most common question we're asked in feedback emails is, "Why, if you're Hillary Clinton supporters, would you EVER vote for evil republican John McCain or any other evil republican" or, words to that effect. (Their illiterate mis-spells corrected here, of course.)
We're also getting emails asserting that the only reason anyone WOULD vote for McCain is because they're racist. Both common questions/statements have the same source -- blind partisanship and built in excuse-making and blame-shifting. Both assume simple motives, both assume everyone's a puppet, parrot robot like the writers of these emails obviously are. For them and everyone else, there is a simple answer:
Same reason we were for Hillary Clinton and voted for her in the primaries, 18 million of us. We were and are against Junior Senator Barack Hussein Obama for the same reasons as always -- he's not qualified, he's not experienced, he's not honorable and we don't trust him to hold the nation's Highest Office. John McCain is the only viable candidate left who we believe has all those qualities and more.
This is a man who served his country in a time of war, whose grandfather and father were both admirals in the United States Navy, who was himself a naval aviator, and was almost killed on July 29, 1967 when he was at the epicenter of the fire aboard the USS Forrestal. He escaped from his burning jet and was trying to help another pilot escape when a bomb exploded; McCain was struck in the legs and chest by fragments. The ensuing fire killed 134 sailors and took 24 hours to control.
With the Forrestal out of commission, McCain volunteered for assignment with the USS Oriskany where he continued to fly combat missions until being shot down over Hanoi on Oct. 26, 1967.
This was his 23rd bombing mission over North Vietnam, his crash injuries included both legs and one arm broken, and when he regained consciousness a crowd attacked him, (shown at right) crushing his shoulder with a rifle butt and stabbing him with bayonets. He was then taken to Hanoi's main Hoa La prison more generally known as the "Hanoi Hilton."
His captors refused to treat his wounds, and instead beat him and interrogated him. When they found out his father was an Admiral, they announced his capture and attempted to use him for propaganda. McCain never gave them what they wanted, no information and no recorded statements, and they transferred him to a different camp on the outskirts of Hanoi.
There, he spent six weeks in the hospital, receiving marginal care. He had lost 50 pounds and was in a body cast, his hair had turned white. He was then locked into a cell with two other Americans who didn't expect him to live for a week. In March 1968, McCain was placed in solitary confinement, where he remained for the next two years.
In mid-1968, McCain's father was named commander of all U.S. forces in the Vietnam theater, and McCain was offered early release. The North Vietnamese wanted to appear merciful for propaganda purposes, and also wanted to show other POWs that what they called "elites" like McCain were willing to be treated preferentially. McCain turned down the offer of repatriation; he would only accept the offer if every man taken in before him was released as well. He wouldn't play their game, wouldn't harm his country even if it meant more torture and possibly even death for himself.
And that's exactly what it did mean -- In August of 1968, a program of severe torture began on McCain. McCain was subjected to repeated beatings and rope bindings, at the same time as he was suffering from dysentery. After four days of beatings and torture, denial of food and water, McCain made an anti-American propaganda "confession". He has always felt that his statement was dishonorable, but as he would later write, "I had learned what we all learned over there: Every man has his breaking point. I had reached mine." His injuries left him permanently incapable of raising his arms above his head. He subsequently received two to three beatings per week because of his continued refusal to sign additional statements.
McCain refused to meet with various anti-war groups seeking peace in Hanoi, wanting to give neither them nor the North Vietnamese a propaganda victory. From late 1969 on, treatment of McCain and many of the other POWs became more tolerable, while McCain continued to be an active resister against the camp authorities. McCain and other prisoners cheered the B-52-led U.S. "Christmas Bombing" campaign of December 1972 as a forceful measure to push North Vietnam to terms.
Altogether, McCain was held as a prisoner of war in North Vietnam for five and a half years. He was finally released from captivity on March 14, 1973. McCain's return to the United States reunited him with his wife and family. His wife Carol had suffered her own crippling ordeal during his captivity, due to an automobile accident in December 1969."Listen, pal. I spent 22 years in the Navy. My father was in the Navy. My grandfather was in the Navy. We in the military service tend to move a lot. We have to live in all parts of the country, all parts of the world. I wish I could have had the luxury, like you, of growing up and living and spending my entire life in a nice place like the First District of Arizona, but I was doing other things. As a matter of fact, when I think about it now, the place I lived longest in my life was Hanoi."
We won't waste our vote by trying to write-in Hillary or staying at home -- we will vote for John McCain, for REAL change. That change being, having a qualified, experienced, patient, hardened man as POTUS for the first time since 1989.
policies are nearly the same" there MUST be discrimination and racism involved. They never consider that it's not the color of the skin -- it's the content of character, of which Barack Hussein Obama has none.
The OIC (Organization of the Islamic Conference) recognizes 57 Islamic states! Read all about it by clicking 
Apparently the Obamas of Kenya have been reading those "scurrilous emails" to which Barack likes to refer, because they have no doubt -- contrary to the claims of the Obama campaign -- that the presidential candidate was raised a Muslim. They take that as a given.