Archive for June, 2008

When Will MoveOn Get a Clue?

Monday, June 30th, 2008

Barack Obama is NO friend to MoveOn. What has Barack Obama ever DONE for MoveOn? Why does MoveOn still put Obama’s photo on its home page and pander to him?

Obama attacked MoveOn head-on in his speech today for its ads criticizing General Petreaus in September 2007:

All too often our politics still seems trapped in these old, threadbare arguments – a fact most evident during our recent debates about the war in Iraq, when those who opposed administration policy were tagged by some as unpatriotic, and a general providing his best counsel on how to move forward in Iraq was accused of betrayal.

Last September, when Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas) attached an amendment to a defense bill that condemned MoveOn’s ad, guess who stood up for MoveOn’s right to free speech (albeit ill-advised): It was Sen. Hillary Clinton, who voted against Sen Cornyn’s amendment. And now guess who hid out — even though he was in the building — to avoid voting to support MoveOn’s right to free speech:

(more…)

Bill Ayers would be so proud

Monday, June 30th, 2008

ayersflag.jpg

The so far left that they forgot what is right wing of the Democratic party has taken a new tact. They have decided that they don’t really have a problem with swiftboating after all. Just as long as the shoe is on the other foot. And Republicans are the ones wearing it. Starting this week they are coming out in droves to paint John McCain, a decorated war hero, as a traitor and a war criminal. And gosh wouldn’t you know it, some people even posted their drivel on Barack Obama’s website.

Here’s a screenshot of one of my favorites. Change you can believe in type stuff if you ask me. Strictly new politics. No doubt about it.

missbunnyblog.jpg
(more…)

Nancy Pelosi - Where Were You?

Monday, June 30th, 2008

What Is More Important?

Many have asked, where has Nancy Pelosi been? As a figurehead in government, a representative of women at large, a benefactor of funding from organizations like Emily’s list, why has she not taken a stand to defend not only Hillary Clinton, but more importantly, the advancement of women in our society.

When asked about sexism and the demeaning assaults against Hillary Clinton by the media, her retort, paraphrased, was she was too busy being Speaker of the House. Wrong!!!

Follow the Money

Enter George Soros, Felix Rohatyn, and Joseph Onek.

Let us connect the dots. In February, 2007, Nancy Pelosi hired Joseph Onek as her Chief Counsel. Mr. Onek is also a chief policy advisor for the Open Society Institute, funded by none other than George Soros.

You may be curious about Felix Rohatyn. Mr. Rohatyn is a not only a major financial backer of Nancy Pelosi but he is one of her top economics advisors. (more…)

Watch rare video of Obama Iraq War Position 3 : telling The Teamsters exactly what they want to hear in 2003

Monday, June 30th, 2008



First of all I'd like to thank whoever first uploaded this clip to the internet. Its marked Adam_final_clip and was downloaded from the internet...but the source is unknown.

The clip is around 90 secs long, yet astonishingly shows a COMPLETE address by State Senator Obama to a labor rally which was organized by the Chicago Teamsters sometime late in 2003. How do I know? Because Obama makes reference to President Bush's request to Congress for $87 billion

When we last explored Obama's views on the war, Obama had got himself in a pickle.

In October 2002, he opposed the war at a peace rally in front a crowd of so-called Progressives and Peaceniks, thereby establishing Obama War Position 1, which according to one Dem Senator from New York is literally his only claim of qualification to be President. Obama proudly displayed his written version of The Speech, on the web (aka Obama War Position 1 )

End of April, 2003 within a month of the invasion starting, American approval of the War was at astonishingly high levels. Why? The allied invasion was complete: Saddam's statue had been visibly toppled.

May thru late June, Obama removes his speech containing Obama War Position 1 down from his website. Eagle-eyed journalists at The Black Commentator notice this shocking development and notice that Obama has changed his message Writing in its June 5 Edition Assistant Editor Bruce Dixon wrote
...a few weeks ago, Barack Obama's heartfelt statement of principled opposition to lawless militarism and the rule of fear was stricken without explanation from his campaign web site, and replaced with mild expressions of "anxiety":

But I think [people are] all astonished, I think, in many quarters, about, for example, the recent Bush budget and the prospect that, for example, veterans benefits might be cut. And so there's discussion about that, I think, among both supporters and those who are opposed to the war. What kind of world are we building?

And I think that's - the anxiety is about the international prospects and how we potentially reconstruct Iraq. And the costs there, then, tie in very directly with concerns about how we're handling our problems at home.

Dixon continued:
His passion evaporated, a leading black candidate for the US Senate mouths bland generalities on war, peace and the US role in the world. Barack Obama, professor of constitutional law, is mum on the Patriot Act, silent about increased surveillance of US citizens, secret searches, and detentions without trial. His campaign literature and speeches ignore Patriot Act 2, which would detain US citizens without trial, strip them of their nationality and deport them to - wherever, citizens of no nation.

For a black candidate who is utterly reliant upon a fired up base among African American and progressive voters, who must distinguish himself from a crowded Democratic field, this is strange behavior, indeed. Polls show Blacks have consistently opposed administration war policies by at least two to one, as does the white progressive "base" of the party. Yet Obama appears determined to contain, rather than amplify, these voices.


Weeks after Dixon made his accusations, Obama sent him an email saying:
The only reason that my original anti-war speech was removed from my website was a judgment that the speech was dated once the formal phase of the war was over, and my staff’s desire to continually provide fresh news clips.

Of course, what Obama doesn't mention is that at that time in America, the formal phase was regarded as a huge success and the anti-war group were not high on anyone's popularity list.

Nor is there any indication that Obama has the practice of removing dated speeches...unless they're politically embarrassing. His current campaign and US Senate websites contain many old speeches including several on Iraq with long since past deadlines.

Obama put the speech back up on his Illinois State Senate website after an absence of six weeks. BC Magazine claims it was only because they publicly exposed him as a political coward.


But some time later that summer when the President went to the Congress for the funding to pay for Phase 1 of the rebuilding of Iraq which was mandated by International Law as well as the right thing to do for the Iraqi people, the stability of the region and American security interests, Obama takes the extreme position we should not be spending that money overseas. His populist message to the Teamsters Union...to hell with our responsibilities toward the Iraqis lets take the $87 billion and spend it on Local issues...thereby establishing Obama War Position 3

I can hardly wait to show you the next video with a complete 180 in his position which floors his interviewer: stay tuned

*Breaking* Kos Tampering with Obama Birth Certificate? [UPDATE]

Monday, June 30th, 2008

[Update at end.]

In my Inbox this morning, I found several references to an overnight “discovery.”

The claim is that if you download fancy image detection software from GIMP and apply it to the image of Obama’s birth certificate, you can see the embossed seal.

Here’s one place the story appears: Atlas Shrugs.

And I received this email via No Quarter:

———- Forwarded message ———-

From: GREGORY [last name removed]

Date: Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 5:11 AM

Subject: Obama birth certificate seal

To: susanunpc@gmail.com

This is a message for TexasDarlin.

Image enhancement - specifically edge detection, makes the entire seal quite clear in the Obama birth certificate (and makes the two folding creases clearer).

Basically, this works because the embossing has created edges that the edge detection algorithms can enhance. I’m attaching a jpg of a copy of the birth certificate that I ran edge detection on.Here are some instructions to do it yourself. The freeware image software GIMP can be downloaded from GIMP.

The highest resolution jpg of the birth certificate can be downloaded from Daily Kos.

(more…)

Who’s responsible for shutting down a number of anti-Obama Blogspot accounts?

Monday, June 30th, 2008

Cross-posted from my blog, Bloggasm.com.

____________________________

When Carissa Snedeker went to log into her Blogspot account Wednesday evening at about 7:30, she had no idea what would be waiting for her. She had created her blog, Blue Lyon, three years ago and up until this point had very few problems posting new content. But this time a message from Google came up when she visited her dashboard.

“This blog has been locked due to possible Blogger Terms of Service violations,” the message stated. “You may not publish new posts until your blog is reviewed and unlocked.”

When Snedeker clicked on the link at the bottom of the message she came to another one that told her that her blog “has characteristics of a spam blog” and, because of this, it had been locked. It allowed her the chance to send an “unlock request” but told her she’d have to wait up to four business days before someone at Google could review her blog and confirm it wasn’t publishing spam.

blogspot locked

“At first I thought it was just this random thing with Blogger’s spam bots,” she told me in a phone interview. “I thought that perhaps in their looking across the blogger universe, that I got accidentally flagged somehow. Stuff like that happens.”

But a short time later Snedeker received an email from another blogger claiming that a number of anti-Obama blogs had been “hacked” that same night. After some digging it became apparent that several Blogspot accounts had been shut down because of similar spam issues, and nearly all of them had three things in common: Most were pro-Hillary Clinton blogs, all were anti-Barack Obama, and several were listed on justsaynodeal.com, an anti-Obama website.

A “Flag Blog” link sits at the very top of every free Blogspot account.

(more…)

Birth Certificate Mystery Ongoing

Monday, June 30th, 2008

In the past 48 hours, several new pieces of information related to Barack Obama’s birth certificate have come to my attention. I will attempt to consolidate the pieces here, and post the questions raised by this set of information. The developments in this story are dynamic and fast-moving. I will do my best, and hopefully we will start to get some answers.

The Daily Kos Diary
In the No Quarter story Saturday, Daily Kos, an Obama Activist, and Forged Birth Certifications, JimJ presented evidence suggesting that the Certification of Live Birth posted in a June 12 Daily Kos story, Obama’s birth certificate by Kos (Markos Moulitsas Zuniga) may have been forged by Opendna, whom JimJ believes to be Jay McKinnon.

Upon reading JimJ’s story, I did a little digging.

The first thing I noticed when I re-read the Kos story is that Kos does not explain how he acquired Obama’s certification, which seems curious given his alleged credentials as a serious blogger.

As it was explained to me by the Hawaii Attorney’s General office, the Hawaii State Department of Health does not issue certifications to the press or public, only to a person with a “direct and tangible” relationship to the registrant (in this case, Barack Obama). So Kos could not have lawfully acquired the certification from the State of Hawaii.

(more…)

Governor Rendell accuses Obama of lying and being unvetted: wants him to be President?

Monday, June 30th, 2008
This weekend Obama let the dogs out...creating something called HOUND, the mission of which is to promote party unity by hounding millions of so-called Democrat PUMAs (Party Unity My Ass)

Who did Obama put in charge of this too-little-too-late effort? Pennsylvania Governor Ed Rendell, seen at right. Seems Ed Rendall is willing to overlook his HUGE personal concerns about Senator Obama that only a couple of months ago, he expressed on National TV


Rendell shouldn't be surprised that millions of PUMAs are less willing to overlook his major concerns. In fact, Rendell's concerns are the tip of the iceberg of a Yellow Pages of reasons leading millions of life-long Democrats to just say no deal to Obama.

Why? Maybe it has something to do with integrity, a concept embraced by millions of PUMAs that obviously hasn't been embraced in corrupt "pay-to-play" cities like Ed Rendell's Philadelphia and Obama's Chicago.

Gov. Randell: There's 50% About Barack Obama We Don't Know Yet

April 03, 2008 4:03 PM from ABC News, by Jake Tapper

<!--

Ed OKeefe

--> As governor of Pennsylvania, Ed Rendell is getting a lot of attention these days as the chief surrogate for Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., as she and Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., square off in preparation for the Keystone state's April 22 primary.

Some highlights from our 37-minute chat:

"I think that Hillary Clinton wears very well, the more people get to know her I think the more they like her. I've seen that transformation with working-class stay-at-home women who last year at this time were very cool to Hillary. But when we were at the St. Paddy's day parade at Pittsburgh and Scranton they were screaming for her like she was a rock star."

Rendell said that Clinton will be able to beat Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., in states such as Florida, Michigan, Ohio and Pennsylvania, and "she's been really well vetted, all the bad stuff is by and large out there, and there are no surprises. With Sen. Obama I think the right now he may run, a little stronger in some areas -- not the key states -- but in some areas against Sen McCain, but understand tha
t he hasn't been vetted."

Rendell says Obama hasn't been upfront about his position on nuclear power -- he referenced a New York Times story on Obama watering down some legislation, after which the nuclear exec became big contributors -- and then said, "but you haven't heard that from the Clinton campaign and you won't We're not going to put up a TV ad saying 'He's lying to you' because I think there's been restraint on both sides. I'm not just praising Sen. Clinton, I think Sen. Obama has been pretty restrained."

That said, Rendell said, once Obama becomes the nominee the Republicans will unleash the hounds.

"You don't think the Republican 527s are going to leave this stuff alone do you?" he asked. "
You don't think you're going to see 527 ads with the explicit comments Rev. Wright said, about Rezko and the land deal? You're going to see 527 ads about all of those things."

It's not as if the race will be nicer if Clinton is the nominee, I suggested.

"It won't be nicer," Rendell responded, "but what there is to construe negatively in Sen. Clinton's background is out there so I think she'll suffer less slippage than Sen. Obama would and that's why I think she's a stronger candidate."

I took issue with the assertion that everything about Clinton is "out there" -- she hasn't released her IRS returns from the past seven years, there are library documents that remain unreleased, we don't know who the donors to the Bill Clinton Library are.

"I will grant you that, let's say that there's 10% about Hillary Clinton that we don't know yet, I will grant you that, but I would say there's also about 50% about Barack Obama that we don't know yet," Rendell said.

He suggested that Obama can win Pennsylvania, but avoided saying that he thought he would.

"I don't know how hard they'll hit him and I don't know how hard, well, either the Obama campaign will respond or how well the American people will respond," he said. "I always like to credit peoples better angels. I think they can overplay all this stuff and I think it could backfire . . . I have no doubt (Obama) can win -- it's going to be tough. John McCain is the best candidate the Republicans could've fielded to win Pennsylvania. He's probably the best they've fielded in probably 4 or 5 presidential elections in terms of likely to carry Pennsylvania. So it's going to be tough but he can win."

Rendell also talked about:

* how women voters have been offended by the media coverage of Clinton and how his wife -- Judge Midge Rendell -- has been personally touched by what she perceives to be unfair bias in the coverage of Clinton;

* the battlegrounds in the state -- the fiercest fight, like always, is in the suburbs of Philadelphia;

* the racial politics of the state -- a buzz saw he ran into when he ran against an incumbent African-American Mayor in the Democratic primary in 1987 -- as well as his controversial comments about white voters not being ready to vote for a black candidate; and

* the scandals involving neighboring state Democratic governors, Jim McGreevey of New Jersey and Eliot Spitzer of New York. He laughed about a David Letterman TV ad that looped him in with those two, but called the two scandals "sad." "I've tried to live as normal a life as I can in my 31 years in public office but its hard. You have to catch yourself all the time...you don’t have the same freedom that a normal person has."

Source for Ed Rendell photo

Obama’s naivity about global negotiations seems to match his bad judgment about National security

Monday, June 30th, 2008



This is an extract from a campaign video released in October 2007 related to defense spending and nuclear weapons. In addition to promising to end the war in Iraq, Obama stated that he will enact budget cuts in the range of tens of billions of dollars. He stated that he will stop investing in missile defense systems, that he will not weaponize space, that he will "slow development of future combat systems," and that he would work towards a world without nuclear weapons. To achieve this goal, Obama wishes to end development of new nuclear weapons, to reduce the current U.S. nuclear stockpile, to enact a global ban on production of fissile material, and to seek negotiations with Russia in order to take ICBMs off high alert status.

As you watch this video keep in mind that Obama has literally zero military experience. Arrogant to say the least. And before you defend him by saying but what about his consistent opposition to the Iraq war be sure to check out this post and stay tuned for several more about Obama positions on the War.

Not only does he plan to reduce billions out of the budget,so but also he plans to deliberately slow down development of military technology which is the foundation of US Security. Our technology is one of the keys to allowing the United States to maintain its volunteer-only military. In time, with less technology it increases the likelihood we'll be forced to introduce some form of mandatory service similar to many of our allies and many hostile nations.

Three reasons Obama is not the person to be in charge of America's negotiations in the International community.

1) Obama plans to be the President who negotiates worldwide elimination of certain types of weapons. How can it do anything but hurt this country's negotiating position to have him publicly declare his personal goal when other countries know that he must achieve his goal within a specific time-frame?...Obama's elected term. As many of the hostile Nations he plans to sit down with have no such term limits on their despots, Obama has already put the United States at a significant disadvantage, which will likely increase our cost of getting the other side's agreement.

2) Watching the video its clear that Obama is driven by extreme leftist ideology, not by practical necessity. Why is this a problem? Because it lets other countries know he cares too much about the outcome. One of the key strategies in successful negotiations is letting the other side know that you care, but not badly enough to accept a dumb deal. With Obama expressing his goal in terms of establishing a world without nuclear weapons he's signaling that absolute ideology rather than pragmatics will determine how far Obama is willing to go in making his final deal. That is not good news for our country's bargaining position.

3) Obama is dripping with hubris. He says he wants to be the man whose claim to posterity is he eliminated nuclear weapons from the planet. People who let their ego get in their way of negotiations make the worst negotiators...(see for example Fisher's "Getting to Yes" in which he shares the results of hundreds of negotiations his research team studied)

In some ways it's ironic that for a man who spent his nights playing poker with lobbyists as a state senator, Obama's negotiating skills seem surprisingly naive. Based on this video his naivety about global negotiations seems to match his bad judgment about National security.

Obama is the man who couldn't stop his own preacher from spewing racial hatred on a weekly basis. If he couldn't negotiate a deal with someone he calls his friend, why would we entrust him to negotiate with hostile nations? And in any case, why would we let him negotiate away our most precious asset? Our national security.

Obama’s Two Faces and Forked Tongue

Monday, June 30th, 2008

by Medusa and Bud White

Two-faced? Hypocritical? Or showing his true colors? Last week Barack Obama made 180 degree turns on three previous positions he had taken in order to seduce liberal Democrats. In an article entitled “For Obama, winning is everything“, Michael Tomasky writes of these changes, claiming that:

It’s acceptable - and necessary - for Barack Obama to compromise his liberal principles in order to get elected

Taking Fat-Cat Money

In November 2007, the Midwest Democracy Network, a non-partisan alliance of 20 civic and public interests groups, released the unedited responses to a questionnaire on federal political and government reform issues. The questionnaire was sent to both Democratic and Republican presidential candidates. Question 1-B asks:

If you are nominated for President in 2008 and your major opponents agree to forgo private funding in the general election campaign, will you participate in the presidential public financing system?

Barack Obama answered the question in detail:

(more…)